Mel Soliz Discusses Privacy & Legal Questions Raised by CPSC’s Request for Patient Data in Healthcare Innovation

Partner Mel Soliz recently spoke with Healthcare Innovation about the legal and privacy issues raised by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s request for expanded access to identifiable emergency department patient records.  In the interview, “CPSC’s Push for Patient Data Raises Privacy and Legal Questions,” Mel discussed the different pathways available under HIPAA and state law for sharing information with public health authorities. She emphasized that health care organizations should carefully evaluate the legal authority supporting a request, whether the information sought is the minimum necessary, and whether more restrictive state privacy laws or technical limitations affect the organization’s ability to disclose the data.  Mel’s practice focuses on health data interoperability, privacy, complex data-sharing arrangements, health information networks and exchanges, technology contracting, and related regulatory and litigation risk.  Read the full interview....

Read MoreRead More

Mel Soliz Examines Whether New TEFCA Oversight Will Deliver Meaningful Network Accountability in Healthcare Innovation

Partner Mel Soliz recently spoke with Healthcare Innovation about new federal oversight measures for the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA), including the appointment of a third-party contractor to provide audit, review, and compliance support. In the interview, Mel discussed whether the new oversight structure will provide the independent verification needed to strengthen trust in nationwide health information exchange, protect health care providers that supply data to the networks, and identify potential fraud, information blocking, or other noncompliance. Information emerging since the interview suggests that ONC is pursuing a two-phased approach with this contractor. The first phase will involve retrospective audits and compliance reviews, and the second phase will involve more ongoing monitoring, with the contractor involved in the onboarding process for new entrants. Mel’s practice focuses...

Read MoreRead More

Mel Soliz Presents on Health Data Compliance & Law Enforcement Record Requests at AzHIMA Annual Meeting

Partner Mel Soliz recently presented two sessions at the 2026 AzHIMA Annual Meeting, addressing practical compliance challenges for health information management professionals. In the first session, “From Regulation to Workflow: Operationalizing Compliance for Sensitive Health Data,” Mel discussed how organizations can translate HIPAA, Arizona-sensitive health data laws, 42 CFR Part 2, and other federal and state privacy requirements into workable operational processes. The presentation focused on practical issues such as data classification, consent management, role-based access, disclosure review, audit controls, breach response, and vendor contracting. Mel also presented “When the Government Knocks: Responding to Law Enforcement Record Requests,” which addressed how health care organizations should evaluate law enforcement requests for patient records. The session covered HIPAA’s law enforcement disclosure framework, Arizona-specific subpoena and mandatory reporting requirements, identity...

Read MoreRead More

Mel Soliz Discusses Latest Developments in Interoperability Litigation on AHLA Podcast

Partner Mel Soliz recently joined the American Health Law Association’s Speaking of Health Law podcast for an episode examining the latest developments in interoperability litigation and what emerging disputes may mean for the health care industry. In this episode, Mel spoke with Brendan Keeler, Interoperability Practice Lead at HTD Health, and Amy Bagge-Smith, General Counsel and Head of Regulatory Affairs at Arcadia, about cases currently shaping interoperability law, including how courts and industry stakeholders are responding to disputes involving health data access, privacy, national exchange frameworks, and CMS’ Aligned Networks initiative. The discussion builds on Mel’s work advising health care organizations, networks/exchanges, technology companies, and data platforms on privacy, interoperability, governance, contracting, and litigation risk across the evolving health data exchange ecosystem. Mel and her team lead a...

Read MoreRead More

Partner Bo Dul Named to Az Business Magazine’s Most Influential Women of 2026

An accomplished leader known for her extensive impact across election, public, and political law, Partner Sambo “Bo” Dul was featured in Az Business magazine’s 2026 list of the Most Influential Women in Arizona Business. The publication’s editorial board and a panel of past recipients selected Bo as one of 34 honorees from a field of more than 2,200 women in consideration. “I’m humbled to be part of such an outstanding group of leaders who are actively bettering Arizona’s communities and creating opportunities for future generations,” said Bo. “This recognition is a reminder that my dedication to public service and free and fair elections is making a real, meaningful difference in our state.” In addition to the Most Influential Women honor, Bo's leadership has been celebrated through numerous...

Read MoreRead More

Jill Chasson Breaks Down New Court Guidance on PIPs & Adverse Employment Actions in HR Laws

Performance improvement plans (PIPs) remain a common tool for addressing workplace performance and conduct issues, but evolving discrimination standards have raised new questions about when PIPs could trigger liability concerns for employers. In the July issue of HR Laws, Partner Jill Chasson examined a new U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals decision that offered helpful guidance on how courts may evaluate PIPs under the post-Muldrow standard for adverse employment actions. Jill analyzed the recent Walsh v. HNTB case, which involved a long-tenured employee who claimed her placement on a PIP supported age discrimination and constructive discharge claims. The court found that the PIP did not change the employee’s pay, title, responsibilities, or opportunities, and therefore did not qualify as an adverse employment action. Still, the court affirmed...

Read MoreRead More